Time to End Debate Over Global Warming


A climate sceptic has said that it is now time to end the debate over whether  global warming is real after the most definitive study into temperature data  gathered by weather stations over the past half-century.

Professor Richard Muller, a physicist at the University of California,  Berkeley, who has been an outspoken critic of the science underpinning global  warming, said that there is little doubt in his mind the phenomenon of rising  land temperatures is real. Over the past two years, he has chaired a group of  scientists who have carried out an exhaustive analysis of more than 1.6 billion  temperature recordings collected from more than 39,000 weather stations at land  sites around the world.

The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (Best) study was set up to test the  findings of other studies and was part-funded by US billionaire brothers Charles  and David Koch.

“When we began our study, we felt that sceptics had raised legitimate issues,  and we didn’t know what we’d find. Our results turned out to be close to those  published by prior groups. We think that means that those groups had truly been  very careful in their work, despite their inability to convince some sceptics of  that,” Professor Muller said.

The Best study has yet to be peer-reviewed but has been submitted to the  journal Geophysical Research Letters. Scientists homed in on weaknesses they saw  in studies by the Climatic Research Unit and Hadley Centre in the UK, and the  National Aeronautics and Space Administration and National Oceanic and  Atmospheric Administration in the US.

Professor Muller and his colleagues, including this year’s physics Nobel  winner, Saul Perlmutter, had suspected the previous work had been tainted by the  “urban heat island effect”, where increasing urbanisation around weather  stations was causing the temperature increases recorded over the past  half-century.

But a fine statistical analysis showed the urban heat effect could not  explain a global temperature increase of about 1C since 1950. Professor Muller  said the warming was not the result of data bias caused by selective elimination  of some weather stations from the analysis, or the practice of “homogenisation”  to take into account changes in weather station positions or  instrumentation.

– From an article in today’s Independent re Berkley report


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: