Archive for June, 2010

New Law for Planet-Friendly Farming

June 30, 2010

Robert Flello MP to introduce a new law for planet-friendly farming

25 June 2010

The Food Chain campaign has taken a massive step forward with the introduction of a new meat and dairy Bill in Parliament.

Robert Flello, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent South, was the second name pulled out of the hat in the annual Private Members’ Ballot on 10 June.

Being selected so near the top of the ballot means he has a real chance of getting his Bill passed into law.

The Bill – based on the Sustainable Livestock Bill – will aim to reduce British meat and dairy factory farms’ dependence on animal feed grown in South America.

Wildlife and rainforests are destroyed so that these feeds – such as soy – can be grown. This destruction also accelerates climate change.

Govenment action for planet-friendly farming

The proposed new law commits the Government to action to limit the wildlife and rainforest destruction caused by animal feeds.

It will also help UK farmers to thrive and ensure they are not squeezed by big business farming.

Robert Flello said:

I was shocked to find out just how much a Sunday roast can cost our planet under the factory farming system. I am determined to put this right by working with Friends of the Earth and other MPs across the House to lead the drive for planet-friendly farming that doesn’t destroy wildlife, rainforests and our climate. I hope the people of Stoke-on-Trent will join me in fixing the food chain once and for all.

Robert Flello MP

Massive support

More than 30,000 people have contacted their MP to demand a fix to the broken food chain.

And this widespread support is reflected in Parliament where more than 160 of current MPs have backed the campaign.

For the last few weeks Mr Flello’s constituents and those of all the MPs in the Ballot have been urging their MP to take up this Bill.

With such momentum behind it, this groundbreaking new Bill stands a great chance of becoming law and forcing real action to change the deal behind your meal.

Fix the Food Chain

26 June 2009

Do you want a healthy planet and thriving, planet-friendly farming?

If you do the Food Chain Campaign is for you.

· What’s the campaign about?

· How do we fix the food chain?

· What can I do today?

Broken food chain

So why are we campaigning to fix the food chain?

Factory farming demands massive amounts of soy – a key ingredient in animal feed. Most of this comes from huge soy plantations in Latin America.

Vast areas of land have to be cleared to grow the soy, causing:

· deforestation

· greenhouse gas emissions

· the loss of valuable wildlife habitat.

Our Food Chain video has the full story:

You can find more detailed information in our report What’s feeding our Food? (PDF† 2.2MB) – or from our resource pages.

And you can learn more about our other work to protect life on Earth on our Natural Resources pages.

How do we fix the food chain?

The Food Chain Campaign isn’t about getting rid of meat and dairy farming – it’s about getting government to revolutionise it.

We want to see them change the deal behind our meals.

What can I do today?

· Take our latest action – you’re just a few clicks away from helping fix the food chain.

· Get our action updates – our monthly Real Food email will tell you all about new chances to take action.

· Get campaigning – find out how to get even more involved. You could also join your nearest local group.

Caroline’s appearance on Question Time

June 27, 2010

1) If you haven’t seen it yet, or want to watch it again, the BBC’s iPlayer link until Thursday for Caroline’s appearance on Question Time

2) We’ve press released two things on the G20 meetings in Toronto, one from the European Green Party, and a joint release from Jean/Keith as our MEPs:

European Green Party –

Jean/Keith on G20 and coal subsidy –

3) If you want to follow some of the news from the G20, the lead progressive news website in Canada is rabble (, and the main newspaper in Toronto is the Toronto Star (

More cuts will make us all sicker

June 27, 2010

Wouldn’t it be nice if our government admitted that unemployment is rising and it isn’t the time for more cuts?

And wouldn’t it be nice if, after all their talk about fairness, the details of every cut was made public with details of who would feel the most pain?

Why are the poorest areas being hit the most?

The more they bleed our economy, the sicker Britain becomes.

We don’t need lip serve to fair treatment, we need fair treatment.

This crisis was caused by the finance sector and is now being blamed on midwives, teachers and social workers. It’s laughable that Nick Clegg should talk about kids’ happiness when the free swimming for kids and 10,000 university places will go.

Another 750,000 people joining the already unemployed can never do the country any good. Why not scrap Trident instead?

Now is the time to invest in a green infrastructure — providing jobs, not unemployment.

Such a pity that Caroline Lucas MP, the Green Party leader, wasn’t invited to join the coalition building discussions where she would have voted against job cuts to public services.

Such a pity that we now have two look, talk and dress alikes running our fragile country.

Northants needs jobs, not cuts and job losses.

“Swingeing cuts were neither unavoidable nor fair” says Green MP

June 22, 2010

Commenting on today’s “budget for pointless austerity,” the UK’s first Green MP Caroline Lucas said:

“In spite of the Chancellor’s protestations, this budget was neither unavoidable nor fair. Instead it was a massively failed opportunity to shift the economy onto a fairer, greener pathway.

“Devastating public spending cuts of the sort announced today are not ‘unavoidable.’ They are not an economic inevitability – they are an ideological choice.

“Nor was this budget fair. A VAT rise, benefits cuts for all, a public sector freeze, and swingeing cuts in most government budgets of 25%, will all of them hit some of the poorest hardest.”

Green Party press office briefing on the principal budget measures

June 22, 2010

1. The Green Party’s major concern with the budget is the overall strategy – that is aiming remove the entire deficit by 2015 or earlier, starting immediately and doing so by 80% cuts in public spending and 20% tax increases, because:
· Doing so as fast as will probably send the economy back into recession with increasing unemployment.
· There is no evidence that our level of borrowing could not be brought down more slowly, so there’s no need to panic.
· We are missing the urgent opportunity to invest in the Green New Deal, an investment package that could create a million UK jobs and training places.
· Cutting public services rather than increasing taxes on the more wealthy hurts the poor and vulnerable.
· There are plenty of ways of taxing the wealthy more, not least by cracking down on tax evasion and avoidance (see

2. Notes on some of the detailed budget measures are below.

Measure Response

Apart from NHS and aid, cut Departmental budgets by 25% over 4 years.
These are massive unnecessary cuts. Front line services like education will be affected. It is a political choice to reduce the size of public services this way, not an economic necessity.

Raise VAT from 17.5% to 20%
A huge hike in the cost of almost everything we buy, which hits the poor hardest. An alternative that would raise about the same amount of money would be proper taxation of aviation.

Cut £11bn from welfare budgets by 2014, starting with a freeze on Child Benefits, reductions in higher Housing Benefit payments and medical testing for Disability Living Allowance.
Major worry is what has not been announced here – it must reduce the income of some of the poorest and most vulnerable. Child Benefit cut amounts effectively to a real cut of 6% over three years. This will be cut from the poorest families as well as the richest.

Freeze Council Tax for one year.
Will force councils to cut local services. We’d prefer a reform of Council Tax which would make bigger houses pay more and smaller houses less, with a new band for very big houses.

Income tax allowance raised £1000 to £7475.
Will help low paid, but will help those on middle incomes more. Would have been better to re-introduce the 10p tax band for those on the lowest incomes.

2-year freeze on public sector pay, with those under £21,000 getting a flat £250 extra each year.
Even the low paid will be getting a real pay cut – £250 is a 1.2% pay increase when inflation is expected to be 1.6-2%. Public sector workers are not to blame, so why pick on them?

Capital gains tax rates to be moved closer to income tax rates.
In the right direction but not enough. There will still be incentives to avoid tax by re-classifying income as capital gains.

Green Investment Bank.
Welcome, but no detail in the speech and almost certainly too small and not equal to the urgent task of tackling climate change.

Pensions-earnings link to be restored from April 2011.

Welcome, but Tories removed it in the first place with the result that pensions are now at a derisory level. We’d take all pensioners out of poverty with a Citizen’s Pension of £170 pw.

£150 in child element of Child Tax Credit.
Welcome, but partly canceled out by effective real reduction in Child Benefit.

Levy on bank balance sheets.
Welcome, but would have preferred a Robin Hood Tax on all transactions between financial institutions, which would raise more money and discourage speculation.

Cuts “destructive and unnecessary” says Green Party leader

June 21, 2010

New report proposes tax-based alternative to spending cuts – and calls for massive investment in job-creation

Green Party leader Caroline Lucas MP will this week tell the coalition government there is “no good reason for any cuts in public expenditure during the life of this parliament.”
On Monday 21 June Britain’s first Green MP is to issue a new report – Cuts: the callous con trick (1) – in which she will make the case that cuts are unnecessary “because the economy could instead be rebalanced using additional tax revenues.”
The report, written jointly with tax expert Richard Murphy and Colin Hines of Finance for the Future, condemns the government “for failing to put to the electorate the option of fair tax instead of cuts,” and accuses ministers of increasing the likelihood of a double-dip recession.

Cuts “are not an economic inevitability but an ideological choice”
Caroline Lucas said today:
“Cuts are not an economic inevitability. They are an ideological choice. Politicians of all parties are now sharpening their axes to slash public spending, forcing those on lower incomes, who depend on public services the most, to pay the highest price for the recent excesses of the bankers.
“There is a choice. We should ask those best able to pay to foot the bill through fairer taxation. That’s the challenge I’m issuing: for that political choice to be made. It must be clearly asserted that we are not all in this together: that some had more responsibility for this crisis than others, and some benefited more from the boom that preceded it. Those who enjoyed the largest benefits must pay up now. For that to happen, fair taxes, not cuts, must become the new big idea to replace today’s callous and uncaring cuts fanaticism.”

Tax avoidance and evasion “truly staggering” – could be as high as £100bn a year

The Brighton Pavilion MP continued:
“The UK is currently one of the most unequal societies in Europe. But the financial crisis offers us an opportunity to rebalance the tax system. We could do it, for example, by applying the 50% tax rate to incomes above £100,000, abolishing the upper limit for national insurance contributions, raising capital gains tax to the recipient’s highest income tax rate, and helping lower earners by reintroducing the 10% tax band.
“Moreover, the huge extent of tax avoidance, tax evasion and unpaid tax in the UK economy is truly staggering. HM Revenue & Customs themselves admit that tax evasion and avoidance together come to at least £40 billion a year, whilst in November 2009 they also admitted there was £28 billion of unpaid tax owing to them. Shocking as these numbers are, some experts have suggested that tax evasion – that’s deliberately breaking the law to not pay tax – might be as high as £70 billion a year, and tax avoidance – in other words, exploiting loopholes in tax law – might be £25 billion a year. That would take the total target for necessary action to collect tax due and owing to more than £100 billion a year”

Cut tax abuse, not tax-collectors’ jobs
Caroline Lucas continued:
“Whilst these appalling losses to the nation’s coffers are occurring, HM Revenue & Customs are pursuing a programme of job cuts which will ultimately reduce their own staff by 20,000 – close to one quarter of the total. This makes absolutely no sense. This programme should be reversed, staff re-employed, and local tax offices re-opened in order to tackle tax abuse. It has been calculated that at least £15 billion of extra tax could be collected each year as a result. That could prevent a massive range of cuts”.
Richard Murphy, tax expert, chartered accountant and co-author of the report said :
“Our report sets out a range of additional options for changing the tax rules for the UK so that more than £40 billion of additional taxes could be raised each year by the end of the life of this parliament. That, together with the tax collecting efficiency savings already noted, would together deliver more than £60 billion of tax revenues for the UK – so preventing the need for any cuts at all.”
Richard Murphy added:
“A government really can spend to save the economy when in a recession. During this one, borrowing has been smaller and unemployment lower than forecast because of the measures taken by the last government to stimulate the economy. This report argues that a Green New Deal involving public and private investment in a massive labour intensive UK wide energy saving programme and a rapid shift to renewables should be the basis for continuing that programme of support for our economy. This would ensure that we come out of the recession better equipped for the future we’re going to face.”
Caroline Lucas concluded:
“Fairer tax not cuts must become the real battleground of this new Parliament. It is the debate the Coalition and Labour alike must embrace. As the full ghastliness and unfairness of the cuts become ever clearer, the public clamour for fairer taxes rather than cuts can only grow.”

Earls Barton Election Policies

June 16, 2010

Jonathan Hornett, is standing in the Earls Barton By-election against Conservative, Lib Dem, and Labour candidates. The seat was held by Lucy Payne, an independent and the other two seats in the ward are held by a Tory and a Labour Councillor.

Here are some of the policies Jonathan is standing for, these also feature on his leaflet:

Free Insulation – We’re proposing free insulation for every home that needs it. Carbon emissions from homes were a staggering 21% of total emissions in the UK in 2005 and this programme alone can cut that by 25%. We’ve done the sums, looked at the timescale and we know it can be achieved within five years.

A Living Wage – The minimum wage is really a poverty wage. Every calculation shows that a real Living Wage – what we really need to provide for ourselves and our families – is at least a pound an hour higher. Greens have won a Living Wage for workers around the country, and now we want more people to benefit.

Free School Meals – At a time when the health of our children is cause for mounting concern, we want our kids to know what good food is and at least once a day, sit down to a proper balanced meal. So the Green Party would provide a free lunch in all state schools in England and Wales every school day, to every pupil.

Affordable Homes – The single biggest financial hurdle for many of us in this country is the cost of getting a roof over our heads. Quickly followed by keeping it there. The Green Party will use tough planning rules to make sure developers include truly affordable housing – for rent not just one-off sales – in all new developments.

Safer Streets – More than half the people unlucky enough to be hit by a car doing a seemingly harmless 35mph, die. We happen to think that people on foot and on bicycles have just as much right to feel safe on the streets where they live as car users, so we’ll introduce a 20 mph limit in residential urban areas, including villages.

Green Energy For All – Solar water heaters will typically save you £40 a year. And the average solar electricity installation can save up to £200 on your annual electricity bill. Never mind the CO2 you’ll save which is likely to be well over 1 tonne. That’s why we want to give as many people the chance to make their own renewable energy.

About Jonathan Hornett – He’s 36, and has lived in Wellingborough for 7 years. He is married and has 2 children, 1 of whom goes to the Hardwick schools, where he is a parent governor. He work as a retail manager and he also runs a Whist Drive. His first priority, if elected, would be improving our local environment. He will help and support all local people, groups, community residents associations and Police in making Earls Barton and Northamptonshire safer, cleaner and greener.

Make a difference to Earls Barton – Vote Green!

Don’t throw it away – give it away!

June 16, 2010

Wellingborough Freegle and Wellingborough Mind are holding a ‘Give or Take Day’ where you can donate and take items free of charge. The idea is to re-use items and keep them out of landfill. What one person no longer needs could be just what someone else is looking for!

Saturday 19th June, 10:30am – 3:30pm at Wellingborough Mind 14 Havelock Street.

•Give something away
•Find something for free
•Clear out the attic
•Save stuff from landfill
•Refreshments available.
Recycle for Northamptonshire

Kings Cliffe Appeal Date Set

June 16, 2010

Confirmed date for the Kings Cliffe Landfill site appeal is October 26 and it will start at 10am. Venue to be confirmed. Everyone who wants to speak has to be there on the first morning, and the inspector will then draw up a running order. Spread the word to all supporters and clear your diaries! Will keep you posted on the venue and any further information.
See for more information.

Gunfleet Sands Wind Farm Information

June 15, 2010

The view from the Essex coastline is set to change over the next year, as 48 wind turbines are erected on the Gunfleet Sands. We join the crew of the ‘Cacheflow’ whose job it is to look after the local marine life to find out more.
Love them or loathe them, off-shore wind farms are becoming an increasingly common site around the British coastline.
The monopiles are driven up to 40m into the seabed
One of the latest of those is being built on Gunfleet Sands, approximately 4½ miles off the Clacton coastline, or 45 minutes by boat from Brightlingsea.
When completed in 2010, the wind-farm will comprise 48 turbines and one off-shore substation. The turbines will be roughly 900 metres apart and from sea level to the tip of the highest blade will stand 129 metres high.
The site will cover 17.5 square kilometres of seabed and should generate enough electricity for 120,000 houses.
The turbines will feed into the substation, which exports the electricity back to shore via a massive underground cable that runs in-land to Holland-on-Sea and meets up with the National Grid at Cooks Green.
Massive piling ship ‘Excalibur’ bangs in monopiles
The site is being built and will be run for its 25-year life-span by Danish company, DONG Energy.
Peter Sills, from the company, says locations such as Gunfleet Sands are ideal for utilising wind power.
“Being offshore allows us to have large turbines, at a greater distance, with less visual impact and less annoyance to everyone concerned,” he says.
“It’s on good construction ground; it’s a sandbank so commercial vessels stay well clear of it, so from a safety point of view, the positioning of the wind farm is good.
How the windfarm will look when complete
“It’s also near to the shore so it’s a short connection cable and there’s a good wind regime as well in the area.”
At the moment, there is an exclusion zone around the site, but once construction is completed, it will be open for boats to sail around them, fish, or just look at the imposing structures.
Blowing in the wind
There are many people who are against either wind farms for aesthetic or environmental reasons. There are also those who say it is not the most effective way of producing energy.
However, Peter argues this is increasingly not the case: “Renewable energy is definitely energy for the future. The wind farm is now a mature form of energy, it’s something that can be easily financed and be produced.
48 turbines will sit approx 900m apart
“Other forms of energy, such as tidal and wave energy are to some degree in their infancy. In five or 10 years time when they’ve been developed they will be bankable projects and then they will be built.
“Yes, wind is an intermittent form of energy, but we’ve looked at the data and we reckon we’ll be able to produce electricity 80% of the time from this site and about 40% of the time at maximum capacity.”
Off-shore mammal men
So far, much of the construction work has focused on installing the 48 monopiles, the bases which the turbines are fixed to, deep into the seabed. Hammering these 400 tonne structures into place has been done by huge ‘jack-up barges’.
With these in place, the turbines can now be bolted into place and assembled over the next few months.
The crew of the Cacheflow
As well as DONG’s own machinery and workforce, the Gunfleet Sands project is also utilising around 40 launches to assist in the construction work.
One of those is vessels in owned by Terry Batt, whose 40-foot boat ‘Cacheflow’ is usually used as a fishing charter vessel, but for now is being used to check for marine life around the wind-farm.
He says whilst it’s like nothing he has done before, it has come along at a difficult time for fisherman and boat owners like him.
“It’s totally different and very, very interesting and nice to know that the environment is being well and truly looked after,” he explains.
Receivers detect the presence of off-shore mammals
“Since DONG have moved into the area, it’s kept local boatmen like myself employed, especially in times where people are facing the credit crunch and not so many can afford to go fishing, so this has been a lifeline to us.”
Joining him on-board are marine mammal observers Mark Parry and Tom Gordon, whose job it is to monitor the presence of animals such as bottle-nosed dolphins, harbour porpoises and common seals.
“[We’re here to] make sure they’re not harmed by any of the excess noise that the piling operations would produce,” explains marine mammal observer Mark.
“So we use visual surveillance for dolphins, porpoises and seals, as well as an acoustic survey of what’s in the water so we can hopefully inform the construction guys that there’s something about.”
High frequencies are shown as bright coloured dots
Whilst Mark scans the surface of the water from the observation deck atop the Cacheflow, Tom uses special ‘passive acoustic monitoring’ equipment to check the depths of the north sea.
Using a 100 metre cable which houses two receivers that it cast off from the side of the boat, Tom is able to trace the area for any mammals.
“It listens for the vocalisations of the marine mammals and there’s a sound card which samples the sound very quickly so we can hear very high frequencies.
He continues: “Porpoises vocalise at a very high frequency which is very similar to bats – about 130khz – which is way beyond our own hearing threshold.
The Cacheflow is usually used for fishing trips
“That’s why we sample very high frequencies that we can’t hear and the computer does the clever bit of looking for the signals within it.”
The work the crew of the Cacheflow do is taken very seriously by the construction crews, as Tom explains: “When a detection is made, there will be a period where the piling and construction has to stop for about half-an-hour from the last sighting of any mammals that are going to get harmed.”
BBC Report 23/03/2009